SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

 

 2004-2008

 

                                 

                                 

 Emsley A. Laney High School

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Hanover County Schools

 

 

School Improvement Plan (SIP)

2004-2008

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools

 

Table of Contents

 

 

Table of Contents. 2

Introduction.. 5

School Improvement Team Members. 7

Safe School Plan. 9

COMPREHENSIVE SAFE SCHOOL PLAN - SCHOOL LEVEL. 9

Safe School Goal/Objective: Show continuous improvement in school climate as measured by school climate survey. 9

Safe School Goal/Objective: Improve safety of physical facilities. 10

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations/Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies. 11

STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2004-2008. 12

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations/Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies. 12

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Improve management of emergency situations. 13

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Improve safety of physical facilities. 14

School-Based Management and Accountability Plan. 15

Waiver Request – Class Size. 15

Waiver Request – Transfer of Textbook Funds. 16

Action Plan for Healthy Students in Safe, Orderly and Caring Schools. 17

Part I – The Profile.. 20

Student Performance Data - Performance Indicator Results Summary. 21

Performance of Each Student Group on the ABCs End of Course Tests. 23

2003 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report 28

2004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Results. 31

Student Demographic Data. 34

School Characteristics. 37

Stakeholder Perspectives of the Quality of Education. 38

Part II – School’s Beliefs and Missions. 45

Build a shared vision. 46

Define the Belief Statements. 47

Develop the School’s Mission Statement 49

Part III – Priorities for Improving Student Learning.. 50

Establishing a Process. 51

Identifying  School Goals. 52

Strategic Planning. 52

Reviewing current School District, State and National goals for student learning. 55

New Hanover County Schools. 55

North Carolina Goals for student learning. 56

National Goals for Student Learning. 59

Developing Initial Statement of Desired Results for Student Learning. 62

Analyzing Student learning needs - Information and Analysis. 63

Defining Student Learning needs. 63

Part IV – Priorities for Improving School Performance.. 65

Identifying Strengths and Limitations. 66

School Improvement Quality Matrix. 66

Human Resource Development & Management 67

Customer Focus & Satisfaction. 69

Leadership. 71

Collecting Data/Evidence. 73

Instructional Effectiveness. 74

Curriculum.. 74

Instructional Strategies. 74

Assessment 74

Organizational Effectiveness. 75

Educational Agenda. 75

Leadership for School Improvement 75

Community Building. 75

Culture of Continuous Improvement and Learning. 75

Data Collection Strategies. 76

Defining Goals for improvement 77


Part V Action Plans-Process Management. 78

1.    Interventions to prevent student failure. 79

2.     Quality tools and systematic process improvement 79

3.     Action Plans by Department 79

Action Plan - AFJROTC.. 80

Action Plan - Arts. 82

Action Plan - Custodial Staff 84

Action Plan - English. 85

Action Plan – Exceptional Children. 87

Action Plan – Foreign Language. 90

Action Plan – Health & PE. 93

Action Plan – Library-Media Center 94

Action Plan - Math. 94

Action Plan – Office Support 96

Action Plan - Science. 97

Action Plan – Social Studies. 100

Action Plan – Student Support Services. 101

Action Plan – Career Technical Education. 103

Part VI - Implementing the Plan and Documenting Results. 105

Monitoring, Reviewing and Updating the SIP. 106

Collecting Evidence of the Achievement of the Target Goals. 108

Standard 1 - Beliefs and Mission. 109

Standard 2 - Governance and Leadership. 109

Standard 3 - Curriculum.. 111

Standard 4 – Instruction. 112

Standard 5 – Assessment and Evaluation. 112

Standard 6 – Resources. 113

Standard 6 – Resources (Continued) 113

Standard 7 – Support Services for Student Learning. 117

Standard 8 –Stakeholder Communications and Relationships. 118

Standard 9 –Citizenship. 119

Standard 10 - Continuous Process of School Improvement 120

Distribution.. 121

 


 

Introduction

 

Executive Summary

 

The school principal should address alignment of this School Improvement Plan with the District’s Mission, Quality Standards, and Strategic Aims.

 

Through collaboration with faculty, parents, and students, the School Leadership Team has developed a plan for continuous school improvement that takes into consideration concerns and issues generated from representatives of all our stakeholders.

 

In addition, we are committed to creating a safe, orderly and caring environment where all students are able to learn and develop skills essential to becoming productive citizens.  Accordingly, our goals are reflective of our desire to provide quality instruction to all our students, improve community relations and ensure school safety.

 

The Plan is aligned with the District’s Mission, Quality Standards, Strategic Aims and the standard course of study.  Highlights of our school improvement plan are as follows:

 

 

Laney stakeholders are committed to creating a school that focuses on the needs of all students.  In addition, we want a school that makes everyone feel welcome.  In that regard, we will constantly reflect and evaluate on the climate of our school. In addition, the administration and staff are dedicated to creating not just a good school but one that is truly “World Class.”

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 


School Improvement Team Members

E. A. Laney High School

2004-2005

 

Executive Committee

Lt. Col. Gary O. Green, Chairperson

Karen Brown, Recording Secretary

Deborah Reid, Assistant Principal

Mr. Robert Grimes, Principal

 

 


W. Russell Adams, Teacher, Caucasian

Sandy Andrews, Parent, Caucasian

Floyd Benfield, CRT, Caucasian

Emilia Boyette, Teacher, Caucasian

Larry Bray, Dean of Students, Caucasian

Claude Bridger, Parent, Caucasian

Philip Antonino, Teacher, Caucasian

Angel Cavendar, Teacher, Caucasian

Amber Chewning, 11th Grade, Caucasian

Katie Freeman, Parent, Parent, African-American

Nancy Jewell, Support Personnel, Caucasian

Wes Knape, Teacher, Caucasian

Nancy Kreykenbohm, Counselor, Caucasian

Irene Lucas, Teacher, Hispanic

Paul Lucas, Teacher, Caucasian

Fred Lynch, Athletic Director, African-American

Rebecca Mayo, Teacher, Caucasian

Delphine McKoy-Jones, Teacher, African-American

Meredith Parr, 12th Grade, Caucasian

Kelli Pattison, 10th Grade, Caucasian

Nakita Pickett, Teacher, African-American

Floyd Benfield, Resource Specialist, Caucasian

Ed Richard, Teacher, Caucasian

H. Gene Rivenbark, 11th Grade Principal, Caucasian

Marie Sherrill, Teacher, Caucasian

Constance Washington, Custodian, African-American

David Williams, 12th Grade-SCA, African-American
Julie Williams, Counselor, Caucasian


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

SAFE SCHOOL PLAN 

 

 

 

 


2004-2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Safe School Plan

COMPREHENSIVE SAFE SCHOOL PLAN - SCHOOL LEVEL

 

 

LEA:  New Hanover County Schools – E. A. Laney High School

 

Safe School Goal/Objective: Show continuous improvement in school climate as measured by school climate survey.

 

 

 

Strategies

Resources

Required

 

Time Line

Person(s)

Responsible

Evaluation

Measures

 

 

 

 

 

Offer training to staff and student body in conflict resolution strategies

Instructors for Health Education course, curriculum materials, NHCS staff development opportunities

Aug 2004-

May 2005

Counselors, instructors, administration, principal or designee

Class rosters, School Climate Survey, Staff Development rosters, bulletins, fact sheets, attendance rosters and minutes from faculty meeting; 90% participation by target groups

 

 

 

 

 

Survey students about safety at school

Safe school survey

Jan-Mar 2005

Mr. Grimes

At least 80% of population will perceive Laney as safe.

 


 

COMPREHENSIVE SAFE SCHOOL PLAN - SCHOOL LEVEL

 

LEA:  New Hanover County Schools – E. A. Laney High School

 

Safe School Goal/Objective: Improve safety of physical facilities.

 

 

Strategies

Resources

Required

 

Time Line

Person(s)

Responsible

Evaluation

Measures

 

 

 

 

 

Maintain a hazardous assessments communication program

Notebook(s), MSDS

Sep 2004- 

May 2005

Asst. Principal, nurse, dept. heads, head custodian, cafeteria manager

Copies of MSDS sheets; memos; monthly review of resource notebook by Asst. Principal and nurse

 

 

 

 

 

Provide instruction on subject of MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) for new faculty and previous absentees

Videos, samples of MSDS materials

Sep 2004- 

May 2005

Asst. Principal

Ed Richard

Mike Kelly

Attendance roster, meeting minutes, copies of MSDS

 

 

 

 

 

Create Staff and student identification cards

Name tags for staff and students

Aug 2004 

 

Mrs. Robinson

All students and faculty as evident by Referrals to the Dean

 

 


 

COMPREHENSIVE SAFE SCHOOL PLAN - SCHOOL LEVEL

 

 

 

LEA:  New Hanover County Schools – E. A. Laney High School

 

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations/Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies.

 

 

 

Strategies

Resources

Required

 

Time Line

Person(s)

Responsible

Evaluation

Measures

 

 

 

 

 

Review established emergency procedures for violent events and Crisis Intervention Plan (i.e. weapons, bomb threat, natural disaster, assault)

Teacher handbook, recommended material, fact sheets, school resource officers, Dean of Students, administration

Aug 2004-

May 2005

Administration, all staff

Attendance rosters and minutes of faculty meetings, workshops, copies of fact sheets; at least 95% of staff compliant

 

 

 

 

 

Keep school’s Crisis Management Plan in line with district Crisis Management Plan

Existing plan, copy of district Crisis Management Plan

Aug 2004-

Sep 2005

Ed Richard

Gene Rivenbark

Completed document

 

 

 

 

 

Train Crisis Response

TEAM

NHBOE and School

Crisis Management Plan

 

Sep 2004-

May 2005

 

Administration

Attendance rosters

 

 

 

 

 

Provide Crisis Management Training for all faculty members

Video

May 2005

Ed Richard

Department Heads

Attendance rosters

 

 

 

 

 

Provide Diabetes Awareness and Treatment Training

Video instruction for all classroom teachers and assistants

13 Aug 2004

Gayle Bordeaux

Attendance rosters

Provide Intensive Diabetes Treatment Training

Classroom instruction for teachers of known diabetics

13 Aug 2004

Gayle Bordeaux

Attendance rosters

 


 

 

STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2004-2008

 

LEA:  New Hanover County                                     SCHOOL: E. A. Laney

 

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations/Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies.

 

Staff Development Activity

Resources Required

Timelines

Person(s) Responsible

Evaluation

Funding Required/Budgeted

Provide instruction on

School Crisis Management Plan

 

Provide instruction to

Members of School Crisis Management Team

Copy of Laney’s Crisis Management Plan

 

 

Copy of Laney’s and New Hanover County’s Crisis Management Plans

Oct. 2004 -

Jun 2005

 

 

Oct 2004 -

Jun 2005

Administration

 

 

 

Administration

Attendance

Roster

 

 

Attendance Roster

None

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

_________________________________                     ________________________________________

Signature of Principal/Date Signed                                                Signature of School Improvement Chair/Date Signed

 

 


 

 

STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2004-2008

 

LEA: New Hanover County                                                              SCHOOL: E. A. Laney

 

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Improve management of emergency situations

 

 

Staff Development Activity

Resources Required

Timelines

Person(s) Responsible

Evaluation

Funding Required/Budgeted

Provide instruction on subject of MSDS

 

 

 

 

Provide first response training

Videos, samples of MSDS

 

 

 

 

Certified Red Cross Instructor

Sep 2004-

Jun 2005

Asst. Principal,

Ed Richard

 

 

 

 

Gayle Bordeaux

Attendance

Roster, meeting minutes, 90% of new staff participating

 

Attendance

Roster, meeting minutes

100% of targeted staff

None

 

 

 

 

 

$3.00 per certificate

 

 

 

_________________________________                        ________________________________________

Signature of Principal/Date Signed                                                     Signature of School Improvement Chair/Date Signed

 

 

 


 

 

STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2004-2008

 

LEA:  New Hanover County                                                             SCHOOL: E. A. Laney

 

Safe School Goal/Objective:  Improve safety of physical facilities

 

 

Staff Development Activity

Resources Required

Timelines

Person(s) Responsible

Evaluation

Funding Required/Budgeted

 

Provide CPR Training

 

 

 

 

 

Provide first response training

 

Certified Red Cross instructor

 

 

 

 

Certified Red Cross instructor

 

Sep 2004-

Jun 2005

 

New Hanover County Instructors

 

 

 

New Hanover County Instructors

 

 

Attendance

Roster, meeting minutes, 90% of new staff participating

 

Attendance

Roster, meeting minutes, 100% of targeted staff

 

$3.00 per certificate

 

 

 

 

 

$3.00 per certificate

 

 

 

_________________________________                    _____          ___________________________________

Signature of Principal/Date Signed                                                Signature of School Improvement Chair/Date Signed


School-Based Management and Accountability Plan

 

Waiver Request – Class Size

 

LEA NAME:   New Hanover County            LEA # 650

 

SCHOOL NAME:      E. A. Laney                 SCHOOL # 326

 

1.       Identify the State laws, rules, or policies, which inhibit the school’s ability to improve student performance.

 

In a few instances, class sizes have exceeded state guidelines.  Further balancing would result in significant disruption to the student body and to the master schedule.

 

2.       Identify the waiver you are requesting.

 

Class size waiver

    

3.       Specify how the waiver will be used.

 

The waiver is necessary to prevent disruption of the student body and the master schedule.

 

4.       Explain how the waiver will permit the school to improve student performance.

 

The waiver will permit the school to function as it currently exists.  Any disruption at this point would be detrimental to the students’ and school’s performance.

 

 

 
 

School-Based Management and Accountability Plan

 

Waiver Request – Transfer of Textbook Funds

 

 

LEA NAME:   New Hanover County            LEA # 650

 

SCHOOL NAME:      E. A. Laney                 SCHOOL # 326

 

  1. Identify the State laws, rules, or policies, which inhibit the school’s ability to improve student performance.

 

Textbook funds must be used for the purchase of textbooks only; funds for any purchases not on the State Adoption List must be transferred to State PRC 61. This may inhibit us from purchasing other materials that could improve standardized test scores, e.g., media center books, video tapes, or compact discs used to supplement classroom instruction. 

 

  1.  Identify the waiver you are requesting.

 

We recommend that the principal be authorized to transfer textbook funds to Classroom Materials/Instructional Supplies/Equipment (PRC 61) budget as necessary.

 

  1. Specify how the waiver will be used.

 

Classroom Materials/Instructional Supplies/Equipment will be purchased to supplement the curriculum.

 

  1. Explain how the waiver will permit the school to improve student performance.

 

The textbook waiver will allow the school to purchase material that is needed to assist in the reduction of the gap in standardized tests.


Action Plan for Healthy Students in Safe, Orderly and Caring Schools

 

LEA:  New Hanover County                                                                            School:  E. A. Laney High School

 

Strategic Priority:  Healthy Students in Safe, Orderly and Caring Schools

 

School Improvement Objective:

 

Strategy

Not Yet Addressed

(What is your plan?)

In Progress

(Please describe)

Need Assistance

(Please describe)

NA

(Provide explanation)

Ensure all students have recess and/or physical activity during the school day and that it is not taken away as punishment.

This does not apply to the high school model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

We do not have recess in the high school curriculum.  Students have 35 minutes each day for eating lunch; all other time is focused on learning.

Implement a coordinated school health program. 

 

We will be:

1) Identifying a team

2) Conducting a “Needs Assessment”

3) Reviewing existing health and physical education criteria

4) Recovering the data
5) Reporting data to NHCS

 

 


Action Plan for Healthy Students in Safe, Orderly and Caring Schools

 

 

 

At Our School

In our LEA

Unsure

Need Assistance

We have a  School Health Advisory Council.

Building Team during first semester 2004-5

Yes

 

 

What other areas of Coordinated School Health Programs are you working on implementing in your school?

 

 

 

 

 

 

E. A. Laney High School Health Advisory Committee 2004-5

 

Coordinator                                                                                        David Williams (Sr Project)

Principal                                                                                              Robert Grimes

Assistant Principal                                                                             Robert Knuschke

Health Education Teacher                                                                 Alan Sewell 

Physical Education Teacher                                                              Ruby Sutton

Other Teacher                                                                                    Delphine McKoy-Jones

School food service manager                                                            ________________

Parent(s)                                                                                             Sandy Andrews

Student(s)                                                                                           Christopher Lucas

School Nurse                                                                                      Gayle Bordeaux

School counselor                                                                                Frank Nardella

School resource officer                                                                      ________________

Coach                                                                                                  Fred Lynch

Community-based health care provider                                            ________________

Community-based social services provider                          ________________

Community health and safety agency representative                      ________________

 

 

 

 

Things To Do:

 

Identify a coordinator for School Health Index Team

Identify Health Advisory Committee members

Meet twice a year

Complete a “Needs Assessment”

            Areas of immediate concern

                        Safety

                                    Crisis Response plan

                                                Designate reunion areas for students and families

                                    Plan for screening voluntary offers of assistance

Staff

                        Annual professional development for health education for health teachers

School Health Services

                        Emergency Response Plans – Athletic Venues

 

Review current health and physical education criteria

 

Recover data of current physical activity and physical education for students – Lt Col Green / Mrs. Newton

 

Report data to New Hanover County Coordinator – Mrs. Pamela Federline 254-4186

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Part I – The Profile

 

 

 

The Profile

 

 


Student Performance Data - Performance Indicator Results Summary

High School

 

Attendance

 

Performance Indicator

1999-2000

 

2000-01

2001-02

 

2002-2003

2003-4

2004-5

Target

Overall Student Attendance (%)

91.7

89.9

91.40

94.16

92.65

95.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Students Absent 15 days + (%)

30.9

37.3

17.7

19.2

27.4

16.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# of Out-of-School Suspensions / 10,000 days

18.5

21.4

14.9

10.3

6.6

6.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# of Days for Out-of-School

Suspensions

2060

4481

1679

1900

2068

1700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dropouts (9-12) (%)

5.8

5.2

4.5

4.4

4.3

4.3

 

School Safety

 

The number of acts of crime or violence per 100 students, which includes all acts occurring in school, at a bus stop, on a school bus, on school grounds or during off-campus, school sponsored activities.

 

 

1999-2000

2000-1

2001-2

2002-3

2003-4

Laney HS

1.1

5.0

N/A

1

2

New Hanover

-

-

2

1

1

N Carolina

-

-

1

1

1

 


Miscellaneous

 

Performance Indicator

1999-2000

 

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Target

New EC Referrals (%)

R-0.0027

R-0.0037

R-0.0046

R-0.0044

R-0.0048

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New EC Placements (%)

P-0.0023

P-0.0026

P-0.0028

P-0.0028

P-0.0032

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Promotions (%)

8.2

12.2

7.4

7.0

10.3

6.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parent Volunteer Hours (#)

2546

1813

6702.25

5668.75

5332

6000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free/Reduced Lunch (%)

13.89

17.6

17.7

28.4

30.6

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNC System Entrance Requirement (CP/CTP) (%)

62.6

59.7

77.7

68.1

69.7

78.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N.C. Scholars Program (%)

36.2

44.0

36.0

44.3

45.8

45.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates Issued

0.12

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.017

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (Scale Score)

998

1018

1002

1015

992

1020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CP, CTP & CPCT (%)

70.8

72.4

80.6

84.9

88.4

90.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scholarship Money Awarded to Senior Class Members

2,056,774

2,895,627

2,445,259

2,935,744

2,500,000

N/A

 

CP - College Preparation

CTP – College Tech Preparation

CPCT – College Preparation and College Tech Preparation


Performance of Each Student Group on the ABCs End of Course Tests

General

 

 

1999-2000

2000-1

2001-2

LHS/NHC/NC

2002-3

LHS/NHC/NC

2003-4

LHS/NHC/NC

All Laney Students

64.56

67.19

75.35

73.15

77.12

# of tests Taken at LHS

4,067

3,511

3,265

3,054

2,634

Male

64.3

 

 

68.3

 

 

73.8

76.5

76.5

75.4

77.8

71.5

77.9

79.0

73.5

Female

63.8

 

 

65.9

 

 

71.0

71.2

68.4

71.7

71.3

70.5

76.5

75.7

73.5

White

71.1

 

 

74.9

 

 

79.2

80.8

78.3

80.9

81.9

80.1

84.2

84.8

82.9

Black

43.0

 

 

45.0

 

 

54.3

48.6

47.6

54.2

51.3

51.0

61.8

55.5

54.3

Hispanic

61.8

 

 

71.4

 

 

66.7

68.9

58.3

85.7

71.1

59.9

66.0

66.2

61.6

American Indian

77.3

 

 

38.9

 

 

44.4

63.2

55.8

-

76.7

59.8

83.3

75.0

64.0

Asian/Pacific Islander

73.7

 

 

63.4

 

 

71.4

83.1

74.8

>95

89.8

77.3

73.7

90.2

80.0

Multi-Racial

67.4

 

 

69.7

 

 

78.6

69.6

72.7

68.1

66.3

73.9

68.9

71.4

75.2

 


 

   Performance Indicator                      End-of-Grade

1999-2000

 

2000-01

 

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

Target

 

Algebra 1

(All)

 

57.8        66.9

mean  % proficient

 

59.5        73.2

mean  % proficient

 

63.1        82.6

mean  % proficient

 

59.4        73.5

mean  % proficient

 

60.3       73.8

mean  % proficient

 

62.0       80.0

mean  % proficient

Algebra 1

(Bl Ss)

 

54.7        54.4

mean  % proficient

 

55.4        53.7

mean  % proficient

 

58.1        68.1

mean  % proficient

 

56.8        61.2

mean  % proficient

 

58.2       65.0

mean  % proficient

 

59.0       68.0

mean  % proficient

Algebra II

 (All)

 

61.6        65.2

mean  % proficient

 

64.9        79.0

mean  % proficient

 

66.4        83.3

mean  % proficient

 

67.4        87.1

mean  % proficient

 

66.6       81.4

mean  % proficient

 

69.0       88.0

mean  % proficient

Algebra II

(Bl Ss)

 

56.1        43.2

mean  % proficient

 <