SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

 

 2005-2010

                                       

                                       

E. A. Laney High School

 

 

 New Hanover County Schools

 

 


Table of Contents

Table of Contents. 2

Executive Summary. 4

School Leadership Team Members. 7

Five Common Problems in Improvement Plans And Their Solutions. 9

Performance Indicator Results. 10

Subject:  Math. 11

Subject:  Science. 12

Subject:  English & Social Studies. 13

Strategic Planning. 14

Action Plans by Department 15

Action Plan - AFJROTC.. 15

Action Plan - Arts. 17

Action Plan - Custodial Staff 21

Action Plan - English. 22

Action Plan – Exceptional Children. 24

Action Plan – Foreign Language. 27

Action Plan – Health & PE.. 29

Action Plan – Library-Media Center 30

Action Plan – Mathematics. 31

Action Plan – Office Support 33

Action Plan - Science. 35

Action Plan – Social Studies. 38

Action Plan – Student Support Services. 39

School-Based Management and Accountability Plan. 41

WAIVER REQUEST. 41

School-Based Management and Accountability Plan. 42

WAIVER REQUEST. 42

Safe School Plan. 43

COMPREHENSIVE SAFE SCHOOL PLAN - SCHOOL LEVEL. 43

Objective: Show continuous improvement in school climate as measured by school climate survey. 43

Objective: Improve safety of physical facilities. 44

Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations. Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies. 45

STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2005-2010. 46

Objective:  Effective management of emergency situations/Develop a protocol for administrative procedures for each area listed in strategies. 46

Objective:  Improve management of emergency situations. 47

Objective:  Improve safety of physical facilities. 48

Objective:  Improve faculty usage of rigor, relevance and relationships. 49

Objective:  Use of research based instructional strategies to improve rigor, relevance and relationships. 50


Executive Summary

 

 

          Principal should address alignment of this School Improvement Plan with the District’s Mission, Quality Standards, and Strategic Aims.

Through collaboration with faculty, parents, and students, the School Leadership Team has developed a plan for continuous school improvement with an emphasis on Rigor, Relevance and Relationships.

 In addition, we are committed to creating a safe, orderly and caring environment where all students are able to learn and develop skills essential to becoming productive citizens.  Accordingly, our goals are reflective of our desire to provide quality instruction to all our students, improve community relations and ensure school safety.

The Plan is aligned with the District’s Mission, Quality Standards, Strategic Aims and the standard course of study.  Highlights of our school improvement plan are as follows:

        Laney’s school improvement team has become the School Leadership Team.  This is a reflection of the schools need and desire to develop teacher leaders.  Relationships

        Develop alternatives to suspension such as Project Re-Direct, Saturday School and more use of various detentions. These were all implemented in 2004-2005 and continue to function effectively. Relationships

        A variety of services will be available to facilitate learning, including Saturday Academy, after-school tutoring, and reading intervention classes.  In addition, several teachers are being trained in Nova Net so that this can be used for tutoring as well as credit retrieval. Rigor

        An increase in parental contact will be accomplished utilizing intervention/referral process which requires direct parent contact by the teacher, Dean of Students or administrator. In addition, an automatic caller system has been installed, quarterly newsletters are published, bi-weekly progress reports are made available, open houses, and good news post cards are mailed.  Relationships

        A reading specialist has been hired and a “Reading for Success” class implemented for students who score at low level III on the 8th grade EOG test. Rigor/Relevance

        Pre-testing and quarterly benchmark assessments will be used to monitor student mastery.  Rigor

        Data spreadsheets are maintained by all teachers for tracking EOC and EOG data. Rigor

        Teachers are required to submit weekly and nine week lesson plans that reflect alignment of instruction with the State Standard Course of Study. Rigor/Relevance

        All teachers will integrate reading comprehension strategies into classes as reflected by individual departmental action plans.  Rigor/Relevance

        All teachers will integrate writing strategies into classes as reflected by individual departmental action plans.  Rigor/Relevance

        All Tenth Grade teachers will integrate word prefixes and suffixes related to biology terms.  Rigor/Relevance

        Contact will be made with the UNCW Education Department and Science Department to seek help in closing the gap between black and white test scores in Biology.  Rigor/Relevance

        Ninth Grade teachers, led by Assistant Principal, Ms. Deborah Reid will develop strategies to ensure that Ninth grade students have multiple safety nets to aid them in the transition to high school.  Relationships

        A Small Learning Community has been created for 120 ninth graders.  This “academy” is a pilot program.  Additional small learning communities will be added during the 06-07 school year.   Within three years all ninth grades will be involved in smaller learning communities.  Rigor/Relevance and Relationships

        A mentoring program has been initiated with the ninth grade small learning community.  All students in the group have an adult or a student mentor.  This program will also be expanded to other groups in 06-07. Relationships

        A summer transition program for rising ninth graders was implemented in the summer of 2005.   Relationships

        A literacy team has been created to develop and implement a school-wide literacy program.  Rigor/Relevance

        Teachers will continue to develop and practice “Best Teaching Practices,” using a variety of instructional techniques by attending Quality Training, explore new methods, attend workshops, observe other teachers and by reading professional literature.  Rigor/Relevance

        Professional learning communities have been established for staff development which includes the study of the book “Highly Effective Questioning” by Ivan Hannel and Lee Hannel. Rigor

        The School Leadership Team will develop strategies to improve the “Climate” of our school as outlined by New Hanover County Superintendent of Schools D. John Morris.  Relationships

        Thinking Maps training will be provided for all Social Studies and English teachers.  Follow-up Thinking Maps training will be provided for Biology Teachers.  Rigor/Relationships

        Staff will be trained in the use of lexiles and students will be tested. Rigor/relevance

        Each Department will do a Rigor/Relevance Self Assessment (see attached) to analyze where they need to focus their efforts.  This self assessment will be completed by Dec 16th, 2005.    Based on this assessment, departments will list five strengths of their department and five goals with two goals to be implemented by May of 2006. 

        Additionally, each department will address instructional planning using the rigor/relevance framework developed by the International Center for Leadership in Education.  Staff Development will also be provided on an ongoing basis using this framework.  (See Part III Priorities for Improving Student Learning)  Relevance

        All departments will address relationships using the Relationship matrix developed by the International Center for Leadership.  (See Part IV – Priorities for Improving School Performance) Relationships

As Laney High School works towards developing an educational environment which focuses on relevance, rigor and relationships, it will use the statements below to guide our efforts.  We will use the school year 2005-2006 for self assessment, planning and initial implementation.  In the spring of 2006, we will again assess our progress and adjust our plans for the 2006-2007 school year.  Rigor, Relevance and Relationships

RELEVANCE:  Goals and activities will focus on connecting the school curriculum to its real-world application through using the tools of curriculum, instruction, assessment, personalization, professional learning communities and school environment.

RIGOR:  Goals and activities will focus on developing relevant school instruction for academic rigor implementation with a focus on use of curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional learning communities.

RELATIONSHIPS:  Goals and activities will focus on developing positive relationships among students, staff and community partnerships while focusing on school environment, personalization, collaborative leadership and professional learning communities.     


School Leadership Team Members

E. A. Laney High School

2007-2008

Executive Committee

Kimberly Williams, Chairperson

Angela Mood, Recording Secretary

Melissa Jordan, Assistant Principal

Mr. Allen O’Briant, Principal




e-mailRuss Adams, Social Studies Chair, Committee on School's Beliefs and Missions

e-mailMari Bergh-Cook, Parent

e-mailBrian Bauer, Dean of Students

e-mailDallas Brown, Career Technical

e-mailMary Dowcett, Parent

e-mailDeborah Gill, Science

e-mailWes Knape, Arts

e-mailRachael Carpeninto, Vice President, Senior Class

e-mailIrene Lucas, Foreign Language

e-mailPaul Lucas, Social Studies - Advisor, Student Council Association Chair, Committee on Priorities for Improving Student Learning

e-mailFred Lynch, Athletic Director

e-mailJeremy Williams, Vice President, Junior Class

e-mailSal Marsico, Math

e-mailEd Richard, Career Technical Education- Safety

e-mailMeredith Roth, Arts

e-mailCharles Martin, Health/PE

e-mailCyndy Elster, Exceptional Children

e-mailAmy Miller, Vice President, Sophomore Class

e-mailSherri Niven, Media Center

e-mailBrenda Olson, Social Studies

e-mailVice President, Freshman Class

e-mailEsther Robinson, Custodial Staff

e-mailAtilya Singletary, Exceptional Children Teacher's Aide

e-mailCharles L. Smith, AFJROTC

e-mail Robert Smith, Parent

e-mailCindy Thompson, Exceptional Children

e-mailKevin Thompson, VP Student Council Association

e-mailKaren Vaughn, Guidance Chair, Committee on Implementing the Plan and Documenting Results

e-mailMichelle White, Parent





SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

                                   RIGOR                                                                                             RELEVANCE 

 

  1. Using research-based strategies.  The plan must incorporate strategies, based on scientifically based research, that address the academic issues.  This requirement underscores NCLB’s emphasis on making sure that Title I dollars don’t get wasted on activities that aren’t effective.
  2. Adopting “best practices.”  For the core academic subjects, the plan must outline policies and practices that have the greatest likelihood of ensuring that all subgroups of students become proficient by 2013-14.  The key is adopting practices that will benefit all students, not just the subgroups that traditionally have had the best chance of meeting standards.
  3. Meeting professional development needs.  The plan must provide an assurance that the school will spend at least 10 percent of its Title I, Part A funds for high-quality professional development.  This professional development must directly address the academic achievement problems.
  4. Using professional development funds effectively.  The plan must specify how the school will use the funds.  In too many cases, professional development programs haven’t had the direct effect on student achievement that was expected.
  5. Increasing parent involvement.  The plan must detail strategies to promote effective parental involvement.

 

 

  1. Setting annual goals.  The plan must set specific annual measurable objectives for continuous progress by each subgroup of students.
  2. Meeting professional development needs.  The plan must provide an assurance that the school will spend at least 10 percent of its Title I, Part A funds for high-quality professional development.  This professional development must directly address the academic achievement problems.
  3. Using professional development funds effectively.  The plan must specify how the school will use the funds.  In too many cases, professional development programs haven’t had the direct effect on student achievement that was expected.
  4. Assigning responsibilities.  The plan must specify the responsibilities of the school, the district, and the state, including the district’s technical assistance and fiscal responsibilities.  That way, it’s clear who’s accountable for which plan components.

RELATIONSHIPS

  1. Social and emotional well-being of student.  The plan should address, through significant adult relationships, how students’ social and emotional needs will be met.
  2. Communication with parents.  The plan must describe how the school communicates progress with parents.
  3. Increasing parent involvement.  The plan must detail strategies to promote effective parental involvement.
  4. Setting up teacher mentoring.  The plan must incorporate a teacher mentoring program.  A good teacher mentoring program can address teacher support and teacher retention.


 

Five Common Problems in Improvement Plans And Their Solutions

 

Problem #1:  Lost focus on Student Improvement

Our School Improvement Plan is a comprehensive plan which includes every requirement from governing bodies such as New Hanover County Schools, State of North Carolina Safe Schools Initiative and Healthy Students Initiative, plus Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.

Solution:  Link Each Initiative to Student Achievement

We need to retain the information needed for each governing body and provide the information needed for each in separate formats.

Problem #2:  Key Activities Lack Scientific Foundation

We are including rigor, relevance and relationships in our improvement process without knowledge of how these will apply to our school activities.

Solution:  Require Research Support for each Plan Activity

We have gathered and included guidelines for determination of rigor, relevance and relationships in our improvement activities and included them in our School Improvement Plan. 

Problem #3:  Too Many Goals

We have established strategic aim points; however, each goal has several improvement goals that support the aims.

Solution:  Limit Goals and Assign Responsibility

We need to eliminate some of the goals in support of the strategic aim points.

Problem #4:  Layering Too Many Initiatives

We have retained improvement requirements from former NHCS administrations.

Solution:  Eliminate What Isn’t Working

We will delete extra requirements to streamline the School Improvement Plan.

Problem #5:  New Initiatives Develop Inertia

We have a process for updating our plan in the summer before school begins; initiatives for change were implemented after the beginning of the school year.

Solution:  Set Deadlines in Advance

We will continue to address needs for improving our plan as we progress through the school year.


Performance Indicator Results

 

Performance Indicator

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08
Target

Overall Student Attendance (%)

94.2

93.2

91.2

95.0

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Composite (% proficient)

End of Course

77.1

76.7

61.5

82.0

Non-Promotions (%)

Unknown

Unknown

5.5

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

Referral Rate:  EC IEP Placement/ Evaluation Referrals (%)

33.3

50.0

37.5

n/a

Referral Rate:  EC

0.0078

0.003

0.006

n/a

Evaluation Referrals/ADM (%)

 

 

 

 

Number of Out-of-School  Suspensions

204

200

933

180

Unduplicated account

 

 

 

 

Number of Violent Incidents

4

3

12

2

 

 

 

 

 

Free/Reduced Lunch (%)

31.9

28.5

28.2

n/a

Number of Parent Volunteer Hours

4735

4731

4689

5000

Dropouts 9-12 (%)

 

4.7

5.4

5.4

4.1

SAT (Scale Score)

 

1007

1461

1459

1470

Five Units of Credit (%)

 

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

n/a

University Prep Completer (%)

 

82

80.0

73.7

84

College Tech Prep/College Prep (%)

 

4.6

9.3

11.9

4.0

 


Subject:  Math

 

 

   Performance Indicator                      End-of-Course      

2004-05

% Proficient

2005-06

% Proficient

2006-07

% Proficient

2007-08

% Proficient

Target

 

Algebra 1 (All Ss)

 

81.7

77.3

45.3

83.7

 

Algebra 1 (Bl Ss)

 

74.1

73.9

28.7

76.7

 

Algebra II (All Ss)

 

72.8

76.4

62.0

80.0

 

Algebra II (Bl Ss)

 

60.2

48.9

49.5

70.2

 

Geometry Test (All Ss)

 

71.3

70.7

55.5

80.0

 

Geometry Test (Bl Ss)

 

45.7

42.3

34.1

70.0

 

 

 

 

 

All Ss = All Students Bl Ss = Black Students


 

Subject:  Science

 

  Performance Indicator                      End-of-Course     

2004-05

% Proficient

2005-06

% Proficient

2006-07

% Proficient

2007-08

% Proficient

Target

 

Physical Sci (All Ss)

 

86.9

64.4

Field Test

88.0

 

Physical Sci (All Bl Ss)

 

78.6

36.4

Field Test

80.0

 

Biology (All Ss)

 

66.5

84.2

65.3

72.0

 

Biology (Bl Ss)

 

46.4

75.0

36.6

50.0

 

Chemistry Test (All Ss)

 

76.8

97.0

Field Test

82.0

 

Chemistry Test (Bl Ss)

 

70.1

100.0

Field Test

75.0

 

Physics Test (All Ss)

 

100.0

75.4

Field Test

100.0

 

Physics Test (Bl Ss)

 

100.0

63.6

Field Test

100.0

 

 

 

All Ss = All Students     Bl Ss = Black Students


 

Subject:  English & Social Studies

 

   Performance Indicator                      End-of-Course     

2004-05

% Proficient

 

2005-06

% Proficient

 

2006-07

% Proficient

 

2007-08

% Proficient

Target

 

English I Test (All Ss)

 

86.4

88.1

66.8

90.0

 

English I Test (Bl Ss)

 

73.4

84.7

50.4

80.0

 

10th Grade Writing

(All Ss)

 

47.7

UNK

57.0

60.0

 

10th Grade Writing

(Bl Ss)

 

27.0

UNK

27.0

50.0

 

Civics & Economics

(All Ss)

 

Not Tested

71.3

73.5

75.0

 

Civics & Economics

(Bl Ss)

 

Not Tested

51.8

48.3

75.0

 

US History Test (All Ss)

 

Not Tested

61.9

66.9

75.0

 

US History Test (Bl Ss)

 

Not Tested

53.1

41.4

75.0

 

 

All Ss = All Students     Bl Ss = Black Students


Strategic Planning

 

Instructions for Identifying School Goals:  Based on data analysis, identify at least one priority improvement goal.  School goals should be aligned to the district theme of rigor, relevance, and relationships.

 

School Mission To prepare all students for the future by striving for excellence in pursuit of a quality education by providing a rigorous and relevant curriculum within a safe and caring environment

 

Rigor, Relevance, Relationship              Ţ                                    School’s Priority                                    Ţ                         Result

                 Correlated #                                                       Improvement Goals                                                                     Measures

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 


1. Ensure mastery of student learning through rigorous and relevant instruction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Establish a safe, orderly and caring learning environment to assure appropriate relationships.  Improve school wide operations management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Insure we are focusing on the AdvancED standards

 

-Insure we are teaching the Standard Course of Study Curriculum

 

-Insure we are creating the right learning environment; reduce student referrals to two per student per year

-Insure we are using research based teaching methods

-Review understanding of the Elements of Instruction/ Integrated with Robert Marzano’s researched based teaching strategies; ensure 98% of faculty members receive training.

 

-Improve school wide operations management; 90% of work orders are completed

 

-Improve safety of physical plant; 98% of safety work orders are completed within one month

 

-Improve students’ interpersonal relationship skills; keep reportable incidents below 17 for the school year.

 

-Develop small learning communities in the ninth grade

 

-Improve partnerships with parents and community - 85% of parents surveyed are satisfied with the school

-Improve student/staff relationships; 80% faculty approval of school working conditions

- Improve the public’s perception of E. A. Laney HS; 80% of parents are satisfied with the school.

 

AdvancED Accreditation Standards for Quality Schools
NC
Standard Course of Study/ NHC Curriculum Guide

 

Dean’s report

Administrative evaluations

 

 

Staff development seminars

 

Logs, records of training sessions, memos, bulletins, SLT and faculty meeting minutes, notebooks, repair records, work orders, logs, records of training workshops

 

 

School opinion survey, # of incidents,
freshmen survey

 

Academy vs. non-academy analysis


School opinion survey


Teacher’s Working Conditions Survey

School opinion survey

 


Action Plans by Department

Action Plan - AFJROTC

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve partnerships with parents and community and the public’s perception of E. A. Laney HS

 

Prepared By:  AFJROTC Department

      

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

The instructors will seek to involve parents of

Lt. Col. Green

May 2008

Parent Volunteer Log

AFJROTC cadets in activities which support

CMSgt Smith

 

 

their child’s preparation for life outside of

 

 

 

school

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase awareness of cadet activities through AFJROTC web page

Lt Col Green

May 2008

Web Page Hits

 

 

Increase the public’s perception of E. A. Laney High School AFJROTC

 

 

Lt Col Green

 

 

May 2008

Guest Book Inputs

 

Articles submitted and published by the Laney and Wilmington newspaper


Action Plan - AFJROTC

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve student reading comprehension and writing skills

 

Prepared By: AFJROTC Department

     

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

Students will read selected magazine or news articles and write responsive essays on subjects appropriate to the topics of discussion and relevant to the core values of AFJROTC.

Lt Col Green

May 2008

Writing samples

The instructor will use the PLANS technique in offering clues to reading material.
Prediction – What do I know?
Locate text structure to gain insight to author’s purpose.
Ask mental questions, e.g. What am I reading?
Note important vocabulary and details.
Summarize the selection.

Lt. Col. Green

 

 


Action Plan - Arts

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve academic performance of students

 

Prepared By:  Arts Department

 

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

Provide weekly tutoring (after school) sessions

Alan Boyd, Department Chair

Aug 2007-May 2008

Published and posted

for ALL students and inform parents of opportunity.

Margaret Carr

 

teacher tutoring times

 

Carl Cerniglia

 

and days

Encourage students to take advantage of

Keith Collins

Ongoing

Record of announce-

available times for tutoring.

Wes Knape

 

ments for tutoring

 

Mack Porter

 

 

Reading comprehension activities will be

Bob Pearson

Ongoing

Tutoring sign-in

Incorporated on a weekly basis.

Roy Robuck

 

sheets

 

Melody Bryan
Meredith Roth

 

 

Copies of: 

weekly lesson plans

examples of reading materials

 

 

 

 

 

 


Action Plan - Arts

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve safety of the physical plant

 

Prepared By:  Arts Department

 

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

Teachers and students will closely monitor the

Alan Boyd, Department Chair

Aug 2007-May 2008

Weekly duty log

Arts building (hallways, classrooms, public

Margaret Carr

 

published in Teacher

areas, adjacent grounds)

Carl Cerniglia

 

Handbook, monthly

 

Keith Collins

 

reports of custodial

 

Wes Knape

 

staff, repair and

 

Mack Porter

 

maintenance records,

 

Bob Pearson

 

work orders

 

Roy Robuck

 

 

 

Melody Bryan
Meredith Roth

 

 

 

 

 

 


Action Plan – Career Technical Education

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal: To ensure student mastery of essential learning

 

Prepared By:  Career Technical Education Department

                        

 

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

Teachers will use pre-tests and released test

Jerry Thomas, Department Chair

Ongoing

Scores on VoCats

information to adjust instruction to ensure

Career Technical Education

 

Post Assessment Tests

mastery and rigor.

Department members

 

should reflect 65.1% of

 

 

 

students scoring at or

 

 

 

above Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Action Plan – Career Technical Education

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve academic performance of students

 

Prepared By: Career Technical Education Department

          

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

To improve parent communication and

Jerry Thomas, Department Chair

Ongoing

Telephone logs

enhance parental/student involvement through calls to parents, progress reports,

Career Technical Education.

 

Progress Reports

parent input, notes to parents, parent/teacher

Department members

 

Parent contact logs

conferences and the Laney web page

 

 

Notes on Parent

 

 

 

Conferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Action Plan - Custodial Staff

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To provide a clean and safe learning environment

 

Prepared By:  Custodial Staff

 

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

Maintain grounds

Johnny James, Head Custodian
Shawron Lemon, Groundskeeper

Ongoing

Monthly reports

 

 

 

 

Provide immediate attention to heating,

Johnny James, Head Custodian

Ongoing

Repair records

cooling and plumbing problems

 

 

Work orders

 

 

 

 

Remove all trash and litter

Shawron Lemon, Groundskeeper

Ongoing

Daily inspections

 

 

 

 


Action Plan - English

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve student competencies in reading comprehension and writing skills

 

Prepared by:  English Department

 

Strategies/Activities

 

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Use data to assess students and to measure growth of students

 

 

 

Use testing data to make curriculum and instructional decisions based on objective data related to standards, students, best practices, and reading

 

Develop and use common rubrics for writing standards

English I teachers

English II teachers

 

 

 

English I teachers

English II teachers

 

 

 

 

 

English III teachers

English IV teachers

August 28 / January 25

October 31 / February 15

 

 

 

August 28 – June 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 28 – June 8

 

Pre-tests

Benchmark test

Data information / spreadsheet

 

 

Lesson plans

Team meeting agendas and attendance sheets

 

Sample lessons

 

 

Sample rubrics

Sample student papers

 


Action Plan – English

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To reduce the gaps in variance through rigorous and relevant instruction

 

Prepared by:  English Department

 

Strategies/Activities

 

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Participate in professional development to obtain resources and information aimed specifically at reducing the gaps in variance

 

 

 

Use cluster meetings to collaborate with others regarding high quality instruction and student learning

Cluster team leaders or designees

 

 

 

 

 

 

All English I, II, III, and IV teachers

August 28 – June 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 28 – June 8

Workshop descriptions and registrations

Cluster agendas

 

 

 

 

 

Team meeting agendas and attendance sheets

 

Sample lessons

 

 


Action Plan – Exceptional Children

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To ensure Mastery of Learning

 

Prepared By:  Exceptional Children Department

                         

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Improve Academic Performance

 

 

Pretest, mid-year tests

-Integrate enrichment vocabulary in order to

EC Staff

June 30, 2008

and 9-week tests

integrate lessons in interpretive reading

 

 

 

-Provide an opportunity for students to respond to a daily prompt (written expression)

EC Staff

June 30, 2008

Writing samples

-EC teachers will address Professional Development needs by participating in the following workshops/conferences:
--Closing the Gap Conference
--NC Technology Conference
--Exceptional Children’s Conference
--Team Teaching Conference

EC Staff

June 30, 2008

Presentation of information to staff

- Utilize Bloom’s taxonomy to generate questions

EC Staff

June 30, 2008

Lesson plans and mentor forms

-Incorporate balanced literacy program into instruction

EC Staff:  Self-contained classes

Ongoing

Computer-generated assessment tool

-IBS staff attend monthly workshops and incorporate strategies discussed into daily lesson plans

EC-IBS Staff

Ongoing

Lesson plans; handouts for staff members

 


Action Plan – Exceptional Children

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To ensure Mastery of Learning

 

Prepared By:  Exceptional Children Department

                         

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Improve Academic Performance

 

 

 

- Disseminate Occupational Course of Study student’s IEP Confidential Summary Sheets to all General Education teachers each semester

EC OCS Staff

Ongoing

Copies of confidential summary sheets to department chair

- Collaboration between Vocational Rehabilitation and OCS team to discuss OCS Internship Program with parents and students


EC OCS Teachers


Ongoing

Written documentation

- Continue and expand school to community partnerships with local businesses that provide internship placements to OCS students


EC OCS Staff


Ongoing


Written documentation

- Require OCS Senior Portfolios for graduation per state department guidelines

EC OCS Staff

5/30/08

Student Portfolio

-Award extra credit points for attending after school tutoring sessions

EC-OCS Staff

Ongoing

Written documentation


Action Plan – Exceptional Children

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve safety of physical plant

 

Prepared By:  Exceptional Children Department

                          

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Improve student/staff relationships

 

 

 

-Organize and execute an Awards/ Recognition event to be planned for each semester.

EC Staff

Ongoing

Certificate; Notification letter

 

-Identify and escort potentially troubled students plus students who are easily taken advantage of to class and lunch as needed

EC Staff

Ongoing

Observation

 

 

 

 

Improve partnership parents/community

 

 

 

and to improve public perception.

 

 

 

-Each teacher will maintain a web page

EC Staff

Ongoing

Web site information

-Each teacher will make phone contact with their caseload parents at least once per nine weeks.
Lesson plans will correlate with the needs of the students
-Weekly meetings will be held with the ILT and a veteran teacher.
-Veteran teachers will take a leadership role in the professional development of ILTs.

EC Staff

EC Staff

Ongoing


Ongoing

Telephone log


Lesson plans

 

 

 

 


 

Action Plan – Foreign Language


Priority Improvement Goal:  To ensure academic rigor and relevance in the academic performance of all students in the areas of reading and writing as well as reduction in gap variances.

 

Prepared By:  Foreign Language Department

             

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

To increase mastery of content area, teaching skills, and strategies to reduce academic gap.

Irene Lucas, Department Chair

 

 

May 2008

Record of workshop attendance

To create, compile and share files with relevant activities which will engage students reasoning and critical skills as well as address target areas.

To create lesson plans that will demonstrate knowledge of state goals and objectives and address students’ learning styles.

 

To provide students with the necessary academic support through opportunities for tutoring, individual consultation in addition to student awareness of grades.

To write/compile and use a variety of assessment tools and rubrics.


Marc Bynum

Julianne Hamby
Rosemary Jordan
Peter Kenny
Cindy Richards

 

Samples of related activities on file.  Samples of related student work.

 

 

Samples of Nine-week and weekly lesson plans with reading and writing objectives.

Tutorial calendar.  Monthly record of tutorial logs; Samples of grade spreadsheets

Samples of test and exams including rubric (addressing reading and writing skills)


 

Action Plan – Foreign Language


Priority Improvement Goal:  To cultivate positive relationships with students, parents, faculty, staff and community.

 

Prepared By:  Foreign Language Department

             

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

Work collaboratively with other members of faculty and staff

Irene Lucas, Department Chair

 

 

May 2008

Samples of shared activities and collaboration.

To participate in school and community related organized activities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To maintain constant and updated communication with students and parents to keep them abreast of students’ performance and other related activities.


Marc Bynum

Julianne Hamby
Rosemary Jordan
Peter Kenny
Cindy Richards

 

Evidence of participation: 
Senior Projects
Open Hose and PTSA meetings
Leadership awards
CAPS
School/Club activities
Community related activities

Letters to parents; phone logs; web site; progress reports (samples); Invitation to class and school activities and events; PEPS samples; conference logs, as needed.


Action Plan – Health & PE

 

 

Priority Improvement Goal:  To improve parent communication and decrease student failure in Health and Physical Education.

 

Prepared By: Health and Physical Education Department

                          

 

 

Strategies/Activities

Name of Responsible Person

Timeline

Monitoring Method

 

 

 

 

-To develop a relationship with parents by telephone calls of no-performing students

Ruby Sutton, Department Chair

Aug 2007-May 2008

Telephone logs

 

Vern Barker
Sam Bobbitt

 

 

-To develop a relationship with parents by sending letters to parents of no-performing students

Bill Hart

Alan Sewell
Sherri Tynes